In a private conversation shared across the network and filtered by the medium of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, Luke Dashul explained his proposal to protect Bitcoin from CSAM (child sex abuse material).
According to the message, the mechanism means identifying “contaminated” transactions with CSAM, and after being confirmed in old blocks, it uses ZK proofs to demonstrate the validity of the transaction when it hides sensitive content.
This validation applies DashJR detailing what is technically present after the block has been identified as problematic. Constructs a fierce branch of the protocolalthough the scope and outcomes are limited. According to the developers, the translated blocks are already “buried” in the main chain and are validated by the network, so they are limited.
“It can be considered after using CSAM to identify transactions and using ZKP,” he wrote, emphasizing that the network has already checked the availability of data at the corresponding time points.
In ZKP, it refers to the Zero Knowledge Test. As Cryptootics reports, this is how to allow it Verify the validity of the transaction without revealing the “deep” information associated with it. Bitcoin pioneer Hal Finey already spoke about this type of encryption and its usefulness in 1998.
Dashjr realizes the meaning of his idea and makes it Hard fork Considering the depth of the blocks seen in the chain, it is technical but “certain.” In response to a question regarding the term “burial,” he made it clear to the interlocutor that it refers to the fact that the network previously confirmed the validity of the data and reduced the risk of a malicious reorganization of Bitcoin.
The Luke Dashjr conversation showed that measures devised by the developers are feasible, but question whether this method can generate incentives for nodes to monitor and send zero-knowledge tests, and whether the goodwill of participants is sufficient, or whether additional mechanisms are needed.
To enhance implementation, DashJr proposed multi-fibers at each ZKPadds a set verification layer and distributes responsibility between the verification agents. «I probably have Multisig-off At each ZKP,” he said.
He admitted that in the current context and in his perspective, limited options – “Bitcoin dies” or trust in a third party, he would prefer focus, albeit extreme, in this stadium.
As reported by Cryptonotics, Luke Dashjr’s conversation suggested that this branch was leaked by Bitconner media.
This private conversation doesn’t follow the developer’s plans for Bifurcar Bitcoin. Rather, he seems to propose various ideas to “solve” the problem, the community of Not, the Bitcoin client he maintains. CSAM invasion of bitcoin blocks Thank you for the 30 version of the Bitcoin Core Update.
