Michael Saylor, CEO of Bitcoin Strategy Treasury Company, spoke about the technical discussions that have been focusing on Bitcoin for months: Op_return Limit. In summary, Michael Saylor believes that the community’s rejection of this increase in limitation is a healthy response, and his position on the subject leads to approaching those who believe that the ossification or immutability of the protocol is desirable. “If I want to destroy Bitcoin, I just want to fund an infinite number of talented developers and tell them to make it even better,” Saylor said.
According to Strategy’s CEO, diluting the value proposition for a product or project is a good idea. In their concept, these good ideas will promote commitment to a good or good idea, ultimately reducing the impact of the latter.
Saylor believes the latter could happen in Bitcoin If the developer includes secondary or tertiary changes in the protocolthey have for better intentions.
I think the protocol suggestions can go badly and badly, due to the very good intentions they have. And I think this discussion about the limitations of Op_return actually lies in 2nd or 3rd order changes. The amount of Bitcoin has not changed (of course, it will be a change in the atomic order of order 0), and the block size has not changed. This is a first order change. There’s something between the second and third orders.
Michael Saylor, CEO DE Strategy.
Saylor also considers the community’s “inflammatory response” to be a “sound response” by rejecting an increase in the OP_Return limit to 100,000 bytes. «Being skeptical about third-order changes to the protocol is healthy. truth? Because it could be a second order change and if it was the first, it could put everything at risk,” Saylor said.
In previous comments, the creators of the global Bitcoin Treasury have suggested that in a very influential appearance, the defensive attitude of this community represents a mature attitude. This skeptical attitude He was able to go out to defend his protocol and his health once Bitcoin overcomes more serious difficulties.
«The biggest danger is a talented and intentional Bitcoin developer trying to do something good. That’s dangerous,” said Michael Saylor in the 2025 Bitcoin framework hosted by BTC Prague and dedicated to businesses and businesses.
I haven’t explained it directly, but His stance on the discussion brings him closer to Bitcoin Knot’s philosophythis proposes exclusively the use of Bitcoin. Bitcoin Core, on the other hand, shows that it considers it to be legal to allocate more space in blocks for non-monatary use.
